Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pickyourpoison
Anyone know who this guy is????
157 posted on 12/12/2003 7:10:33 AM PST by wisconsinconservative ("The penalty good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]


To: wisconsinconservative; pc93; sweetliberty; tutstar; KDubRN; nicmarlo
I can't see the original post below, so I 'll copy and paste it in.

Although this is an old post, maybe some confusion still reigns, so I'll reply.

I hope that no one is put off by my apparent attack on Jeb in regards to my lawsuits which seek the mandatory recount law requires in some instances.

I am only on the side of the Law, so matter who is the perpetrator, and, in fact, it was Jim Smith, a buck-toothed Democrat, and successor to Sec of State, Kathrine Harris, who violated the election laws here.

What is more important than party politics is the fact that the election laws were violated in 2002 (Reno v McBride). Now, in 2000, I also filed an amicus with regards to that election (Bush v Gore), but I did not allege a violation of law, only a suggestion that we, like Hawaii in 1960 (JFK v Nixon) and Washington State (Sen Marie Cantwell) do a statewide recount, becasue I didn't want there to be questions about George W Bush's eventual victory, a cloud so to speak hanging over his head.

Now, in 2002, that was a dfifferent story: While Al Gore got a count, statewide machine recount, and some hand counts to boot, Reno who was also defeated by less than half a percent, was illegally denied.

Now, she's given up, but my suits are still valid.

Sorry if you're confused, but I'll make my point:

The 2002 Reno v McBride election had one thing in common with the mistreatments of Theresa Schindler-Schiavo:

Both were illegal, hense my reluctant, but eventual, involvment. I'm not a lawyer - or even a law student, so I am being taken from my normal line of work to do these things, but alas, I am right: The "Rule of Law" msut be upheld.

(Yes, I know Reno's a Democrat, but the laws still applies to protect her - whether she likes it or not.)

The 2000 amicus was merely an attempt to avoid any dark clouds over GW Bush, by giving the democrats all the chances they needed to silence the critics.

My side of the 2002 lawsuit is posted on my website - and we've all but forgotten the 2000 election.

Gordon Watts in Lakeland

http://HomeTown.AOL.com/Gww1210

or

http://www.GeoCities.com/Gordon_Watts32313

Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies

Terri's Fight - (Daily Thread/Updates)

Posted by wisconsinconservative to pc93; sweetliberty; tutstar; KDubRN; nicmarlo
On News/Activism 12/12/2003 6:42:38 AM PST #155 of 335

It appears that Gordon W.Watts was involved in the 2000 Florida election fiasco.

Look here: http://www.flcourts.org/sct/clerk/briefs/2003/201-400/03-385_ini.pdf

and here: http://www.flcourts.org/pubinfo/election/OrdWatts.pdf

I'm not quite awake yet so I can't tell whcih side he was on. Can anyone figure these docs out?
336 posted on 01/02/2004 7:11:09 AM PST by gww1210 (Gordon Watts to news media: Myths about Schiavo need to be debunked!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson