1 posted on
12/04/2003 2:43:25 PM PST by
Wooley
To: Wooley
Insane in the Membrane, its insane got no brain! To quote Cypress Hill.
2 posted on
12/04/2003 2:47:08 PM PST by
vpintheak
(Our Liberties we prize, and our rights we will maintain!)
To: Wooley
Seems like they would need a hydrogen source at some point in the process.
4 posted on
12/04/2003 3:31:21 PM PST by
RightWhale
(Close your tag lines)
To: Wooley
Couldn't we get SOOOO much more accomplished regarding Mars (etcetera) if only government space agencies such as NASA simply offered competitive prizes like the one Charles Lindberg won for crossing the Atlantic? NASA's allowed to propose competitive prizes (as Newt Gingrich advocates) but unlike DARPA, NASA conveniently won't jeopardize its bureaucrats' and pet contractors' sinecures (I mean "jobs") by offering them. For more on this statist scandal from the space program which has a larger budget than all the rest of the world's civilian space agencies COMBINED:
http://www.SpaceProjects.com/prizes
To: Wooley
The ideal technology for space travel would be simple, robust, reliable, lightweight, and volumetrically efficient. It would have no moving parts, which would make it less likely to break. It would be a passive technology, not requiring any energy from the outside. It would be small. It would be light. An ideal technology for space, says chemical engineer Doug Way, is the membrane. Insane in the membrane.
Insane in the brain.
8 posted on
12/25/2003 5:13:45 AM PST by
Lazamataz
(BadgerBadgerBadgerBadgerBadgerBadgerBadgerBadgerBadgerBadger MUSHROOM MUSHROOM.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson