Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: longtermmemmory
Homosexuals have no place raising children.

While I agree with you, this question has to do with those who oppose homosexual marriage and suppot homosexual civil unions. Those people also believe those homosexuals, so joined, should be able to adopt children (or have them in the case of a female "couple"). So I still don't see procreation as the sticking point that forced the gay propaganda machine to take a detour in redefining marriage.

Love's been redefined. Committment has been redefined. Safe-sex has been redefined. Monagomy has been redefined. Why are they finding it so hard to get marriage redefined?

Shalom. Shalom.

79 posted on 12/04/2003 1:39:19 PM PST by ArGee (Scientific reasoning makes it easier to support gross immorality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies ]


To: ArGee
Love has never had any legal part of marriage. It is a hollywood myth.

There is no reason to redefine marriage just so Bruce can stick his privates in anther Bruce.
81 posted on 12/04/2003 1:43:46 PM PST by longtermmemmory (Vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson