To: Jaysun
My point was that people are supportive of "civil unions" and not homosexual marriage because they are misinformed. But why didn't that misinformation cause them to embrace homosexual marriage?
Shalom.
30 posted on
12/04/2003 10:59:59 AM PST by
ArGee
(Scientific reasoning makes it easier to support gross immorality.)
To: ArGee
But why didn't that misinformation cause them to embrace homosexual marriage?
Because homosexual marriage is so obvious. They tried, mind you, but failed. So they went back to the drawing boards and out came "civil unions". The misinformation comes in the implication of what civil unions are. The left says that it's just two adults living together like anyone else who shouldn't be discriminated against. I say that it's homosexual marriage under a new name. That's it. I still say that this isn't going to make sense to us because it's a brainchild of the left. Now, I really do believe that if the public understood that "civil unions" is just a name game they'd readily reject it in the same way that they rejected homosexual marriage. Our job is to figure out how to let them know.
41 posted on
12/04/2003 11:16:22 AM PST by
Jaysun
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson