[Just mythoughts]

Interesting what you call "mantras". I am not the one who came up with the "MISSING LINK" mantra.

You expect under the "E's" "mantra" of sequential transition pictures, with no bones, to give evidence to be called "FACT".

I look at what is evident, what the Bible does in "FACT" say and the evidence does not dispute what is Written, in fact the evidence proves what is WRITTEN.

HAVE YOU NOT READ?

[VadeRetro]

You expect under the "E's" "mantra" of sequential transition pictures, with no bones, to give evidence to be called "FACT".

This is a joke at so many levels. Level One:

Linked to this thread already:

Source. These are not the only pictures in existence, by the way. What you noisily demand from others, you could have looked into for yourself had you the slightest curiosity to know if there existed evidence against your position. That of course would be a very un-creationist thing to do and you didn't do it. Then, the odds were incredibly against. At the seminars that crank out cookie-cutter cloned mantra-chanters, they teach you to be dragged kicking, screaming, and professing ignorance.

Level two is coming next. It doesn't matter what bones are provided. Your demand is empty, posturing for the lurkers. There are stupid lawyering tricks to make any amount of unwanted bones go away.

[Modernman]

I look at what is evident, what the Bible does in "FACT" say and the evidence does not dispute what is Written, in fact the evidence proves what is WRITTEN

Please provide some examples that are verified by independent sources. For example, can you show evidence that there are humans who lived for hundreds of years?

Your evidence has to meet the same standards (peer review, etc.) that is required by scientists when dealing with evolution.

[laredo44]

I look at what is evident, what the Bible does in "FACT" say and the evidence does not dispute what is Written, in fact the evidence proves what is WRITTEN.

The Bible says the earth was created before the stars. What's the evidence that supports that?