[Age of Reason]

It's the ol' slippery-slope.

If gays can marry gays, then . . .

Why not threesomes of all the same sex or various mixtures or some combination of sexes and humans and their pets . . . and why stop at 3?

And then how about marrying animals to animals?

Eventually, everyone can make and dissolve whatever unions they please . . . .

Then once that happens, marriage loses all universality and ceases to mean anything.

So then when that day comes, why bother getting married and why should the state care?

[Patangeles]

The situation is getting weirder and weirder by the day.

[Patangeles]

The situation is getting weirder and weirder by the day.

[weegee]

If you look at the "goal" as being the destruction of the role of the "family" in society, then I would say that the left is well on their way to achieving their goal.

It's a mainstreaming of abberations and an open disregard for norms.

[tortoise]

...and why should the state care?

I've been asking myself that for years. Marriage should be solely in the domain of the church (or whatever your local equivalent is).