Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: hchutch
Tom Waddle was an outlier. Sure, you will find exceptions in which someone without much talent excels. But these cases are extremely rare. 99.9% of the time, you need talent to excel. I'm sorry if you're in denial about this fact.

Take someone with a good work ethic from anywhere on this globe, be he/she Mexican, Chinese, African, Arab, or European, and they and/or their children will do just fine here in the United States - no matter what their genetic makeup is.

Which is why, of course, IQ is the best predictor of future income than any other variable.

If you have an IQ under 100, I don't care how hard you work. You're just not going to become a brilliant scientist. Of course, there people with IQ's over 150 who don't amount to anything. That just means IQ is a necessary but not sufficient condition for intellectual success.

94 posted on 12/03/2003 11:59:24 AM PST by traditionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]


To: traditionalist
So now you go from genetics to IQ?
95 posted on 12/03/2003 12:02:39 PM PST by hchutch ("I don't see what the big deal is, I really don't." - Major Vic Deakins, USAF (ret.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

To: traditionalist
Every year I take the IQ test, it goes up ten points. The IQ test is crap. Predicting someone's future on a crappy skewed test is garbage.
104 posted on 12/03/2003 12:16:07 PM PST by cyborg (mutt-american)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson