Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: inquest
He never acknolwedged that the lost the popular vote and therefore should have reached out from day one to those who did NOT vote for him -- to make good on his promise. Instead, he has used 9/11 to drive a wedge between the corporate ("war on terror") class and the people, in my opinion, as a journalist, whose livelihood is based on fact and not opinion.
I subscribe to classical Republican values thqat date back to Lincoln. In that spirit, I will reach out to voters and find our common ground, not exploit our differences.
It is time to take a stand and define what the GOP stands for now that the US is an unopposed superpower and can shape world policy unilaterally for a generation to come.
That is a serious responsibility that warrants debate, even against an incumbent President.
Do you agree?
79 posted on 11/29/2003 6:54:51 PM PST by Republican Challenger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]


To: Republican Challenger
So-called 'journalists' are just the mouthpieces of the latest liberal fad cause, and nothing in your post has contradicted that statement.
89 posted on 11/29/2003 6:57:48 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: Republican Challenger


101 posted on 11/29/2003 7:01:30 PM PST by Cultural Jihad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: Republican Challenger
I don't agree that he owed anything to any Gore voter. A leader needs to lead by his convictions (assuming he has any), not by polls.

The rest of your post speaks in such generalities that it's impossible to make heads or tails out of. Overall, however, he's bent over backwards to please the liberal constituency in this country. His massive education spending, his refusal to do anything at all about illegal immigration, his constant pressuring of Israel to cave into the PA's demands, his push for AIDS funding in Africa, and of course the recent Medicare entitlements are all evidence of this.

102 posted on 11/29/2003 7:01:30 PM PST by inquest (Government: Guilty until proven innocent)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: Republican Challenger
There may still be a few "debates" left if you hurry. I'm sure they can find a tenth podium for you.
115 posted on 11/29/2003 7:07:03 PM PST by auboy (I'm out here on the front lines, sleep in peace tonight–American Soldier–Toby Keith, Chuck Cannon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: Republican Challenger
Bwa-ha-haaaaa. Da. Class warfare. Straight out of the USSR. You must be proud. As far as I'm concerned, he's pandered way too much to the squishy middle and the never-appeasable left. But I like his chances better than yours.
118 posted on 11/29/2003 7:09:41 PM PST by CounterCounterCulture (The bullets inside are very hot. Why do I feel so cold?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

To: Republican Challenger
That is a serious responsibility that warrants debate, even against an incumbent President.

You choose to debate Bush at his strongest point? The Muslim terrorist is an immediate threat to our nations security but he is not the biggest threat...Look further East...to an emerging China and a desperate N. Korea. They are communist behemoths whose stated intentions toward this country should make ones hair stand on end. Many expect conflict within two decades. As President, how important do you think a military foothold in the ME and Afghanistan would be in countering this greater future threat. Look at your World Atlas. Our national security depends on our ability to extend our military power

President Bush said this while he was still Gov. of Texas:

We must see China clearly -- not through the filters of posturing and partisanship. China is rising, and that is inevitable. Here, our interests are plain: We welcome a free and prosperous China. We predict no conflict. We intend no threat. And there are areas where we must try to cooperate: preventing the spread of weapons of mass destruction; attaining peace on the Korean peninsula.

Yet the conduct of Chinas government can be alarming abroad, and appalling at home. Beijing has been investing its growing wealth in strategic nuclear weapons... new ballistic missiles; a blue-water navy and a long-range airforce. It is an espionage threat to our country. Meanwhile, the State Department has reported that ;all public dissent against the party and government [has been] effectively silenced; a tragic achievement in a nation of 1.2 billion people.

Chinas government is an enemy of religious freedom and a sponsor of forced abortion; policies without reason and without mercy. All of these facts must be squarely faced. China is a competitor, not a strategic partner. We must deal with China without ill-will; but without illusions. By the same token, that regime must have no illusions about American power and purpose. As Dean Rusk observed during the Cold War, It is not healthy for a regime ... to incur, by their lawlessness and aggressive conduct, the implacable opposition of the American people.

We must show American power and purpose in strong support for our Asian friends and allies; for democratic South Korea across the Yellow Sea... for democratic Japan and the Philippines across the China

seas ... for democratic Australia and Thailand. This means keeping our pledge to deter aggression against the Republic of Korea, and strengthening security ties with Japan. This means expanding theater missile defenses among our allies.

And this means honoring our promises to the people of Taiwan. We do not deny there is one China. But we deny the right of Beijing to impose their rule on a free people. As I've said before, we will help Taiwan to defend itself.

http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a395503e07c50.htm

The Bush Administration's military strategy is multi-dimensional. I know that our soldiers in Iraq are targets for every Islamic nutjob on the planet...But better we keep it on their turf then then here on our streets with our citizens as the target. The soldiers are doing their jobs and we need to do ours by at least giving them our unconditional support.

Unless you can articulate a comprehensive plan for our national security you will not be getting my vote either.

175 posted on 11/29/2003 7:48:12 PM PST by KDD (I didn't say it was your fault;;I said...I was going to blame you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson