To: dcwusmc
Why is it you speak of both Bush 41 and 43 in such derogatory terms?
To: nicmarlo
Why? Does the record of each of them not speak volumes to you? Perhaps, just MAYBE, Dubya has done ok with the WOT, but I won't even give you that until he starts enforcing the WHOLE Bill of Rights and gets out of my way as far as providing for my own safety, as well as that of my family. He has NOT made us any "safer" with USA-PATRIOT or the TSA or any of that BravoSierra. And his spending would do credit to the whole Sixth Fleet with weekend liberty and a trainload of booze (for the uninitiated, he is spending money like a drunken sailor... MY money.) Daddy gave us "Read my lips" and then turned around and slapped gun-owners in the face with his import ban. So I have damn little respect for either member of the bush dynasty. In neither case, did their ventures into the Mid East accomplish their STATED purpose. Whether they accomplished any other purpose I leave to history to decide. I may have to hold my nose and vote for dubya... though that isn't a given... but I do NOT have to like or respect either elder or junior bush.
464 posted on
11/29/2003 10:27:33 PM PST by
dcwusmc
("The most dangerous man, to any government, is the man who is able to think things out for hims)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson