To: Paul Atreides
I don't believe that she ever reads any e-mail; her screeners most likely dump it all. I know neither she nor her staff respond to any I've ever sent. The website and e-mail she has is a phony as she.
To: nicmarlo
I always get a form letter via snailmail in response to emails I've sent my (Oklahoma) Senators. They're Republicans, of course. The letters are always vague but at least on the general topic, which means SOMEONE is reading or at least skimming the emails, and making hatch-marks on some list before initiating whichever process generates the more-or-less correct form letter to me.
517 posted on
11/29/2003 10:12:54 AM PST by
ChemistCat
(Hang in there, Terri. Absorb. Take in. Live. Heal.)
To: nicmarlo
I don't believe that she ever reads any e-mail; her screeners most likely dump it all. I know neither she nor her staff respond to any I've ever sent. The website and e-mail she has is a phony as she. I have found that letters to the editor do a good job.. lets EVERYONE know.. if you write it "nice" enough so the eds will publish
572 posted on
11/29/2003 10:28:45 AM PST by
DollyCali
(Spell Button: to cast a spell on recipient of post)
To: nicmarlo
I don't believe that she ever reads any e-mail; her screeners most likely dump it all. I know neither she nor her staff respond to any I've ever sent. The website and e-mail she has is a phony as she.I agree. During our live filibuster thread, they were hanging up on our FReepers calling the democrat cloakroom.
They are above our voice, but not above our vote.
They are SO doomed.
1,166 posted on
11/29/2003 5:35:30 PM PST by
RandallFlagg
("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson