Skip to comments.
Michael Schiavo Again Seeks to Block New Information About Terri
LifeNews.com ^
| November 28, 2003
| Steven Ertelt
Posted on 11/28/2003 11:17:50 AM PST by nickcarraway
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
To: Lady In Blue; Canticle_of_Deborah; MarMema; kimmie7; floriduh voter; JulieRNR21; NautiNurse; ...
ping
2
posted on
11/28/2003 11:19:10 AM PST
by
nickcarraway
(www.terrisfight.org)
To: nickcarraway
Since when did CRIMINAL suspects have the right to STOP and investigation?
I know - he is not considered a criminal suspect - LEGALLY - but by what right is he claiming that the police cannot investigate a POSSIBLE criminal matter? I've never heard of blocking an investigator from TALKING to possible witnesses??!!??
3
posted on
11/28/2003 11:22:14 AM PST
by
steplock
(www.FOCUS.GOHOTSPRINGS.com)
To: steplock
Makes me wonder what happened to the equal access under the law?
Criminal defenses use it to force police to release papers and anything that might free their clients.
4
posted on
11/28/2003 11:24:22 AM PST
by
Darksheare
(Even as we speak, my 100,000 killer wombat army marches forth)
To: nickcarraway
attorneys for the ACLU asked Circuit Court Judge Douglas Baird to disallow Bush's attorneys from taking depositions from seven people
The ACLU has just discovered a new right that desperately needs their protection: the right to murder your wife without government interference.
5
posted on
11/28/2003 11:31:46 AM PST
by
samtheman
To: nickcarraway; MarMema
**Michael Schiavo and Jodi Centonze, the woman with whom he lives and has one child and another one the way, are two of the people Bush attorneys want to question.**
Oh, this will be fun to watch!
6
posted on
11/28/2003 11:34:23 AM PST
by
Salvation
(†With God all things are possible.†)
To: steplock
I know - he is not considered a criminal suspect - LEGALLY - but by what right is he claiming that the police cannot investigate a POSSIBLE criminal matter? I've never heard of blocking an investigator from TALKING to possible witnesses??!!??
Huh? The issue is depositions by attorneys.
To: Salvation
I actually believe she gave birth to the child on October 31.
8
posted on
11/28/2003 11:36:14 AM PST
by
nickcarraway
(www.terrisfight.org)
To: steplock; nickcarraway
Since when did CRIMINAL suspects have the right to STOP and investigation? I know - he is not considered a criminal suspect - LEGALLY - but by what right is he claiming that the police cannot investigate a POSSIBLE criminal matter? I've never heard of blocking an investigator from TALKING to possible witnesses??!!??
If anyone still thinks that you can get justice from the court system, this should wake them up. This is not only biased, but illegal imo. What the heck is going on?
9
posted on
11/28/2003 11:38:04 AM PST
by
TheSpottedOwl
(I'd rather have dead rats in my walls, than Hillary for President.,)
To: steplock
"Since when did CRIMINAL suspects have the right to STOP and investigation?" Florida is so totally screwed up. The person who should be most suspect, not only isn't officially a suspect of anything, although his behavior is highly suspect by even the most conservative of definitions, and yet he is put in the position of making a death sentence decision on purely hearsay "evidence," with the blessing of the Florida kangaroo circus court, on behalf of a woman who has committed no crime (unless refusal to die is a crime in Florida now), when a serial killer on death row would have been afforded better treatment than Terri Schiavo Schindler. It is a sick and twisted world we live in.
10
posted on
11/28/2003 12:00:34 PM PST
by
sweetliberty
(Better to keep silent and be thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt)
To: nickcarraway
Ever the charmer, this Michael creature!
11
posted on
11/28/2003 12:11:27 PM PST
by
headsonpikes
(Spirit of '76 bttt!)
To: sweetliberty
It's obvious that Schiavo and his mistress are scared of what might be uncovered. The corruption in Florida is unbelievable -- makes one reconsider wanting to go there.
12
posted on
11/28/2003 12:20:37 PM PST
by
Dante3
To: nickcarraway
MS and Felos are not on solid legal ground, they are just playing for time. Bush cites numerous authorities for discovery, and questions of constitutionality being a mixture of fact and law in his Response, Nov. 19, pg 10.
Felos does not lay out strong legal authorities for disallowing discovery in his Motion for Protective Order.
Historically the ACLU is on Bush's side in this mini-battle. Defendants are allowed discovery in order to present a defense. MS sued Bush and Bush is allowed to determine the facts of the case in order to present a defense.
Also, Bush's Executive Order calls for a GAL to be appointed in circumstances such as Terri's when the potential for "abuse, exploitation and mistake" is high - therefore Bush may seek discovery to determine if those circumstances apply to Terri.
If MS has nothing to hide, what's he afraid of? I thought he would be eager to introduce evidence to show how honorably he has acted as Terri's husband and guardian!? (/sarcasm)
The main thing is, MS is not on trial here, though he and Felos behave as if he is. Gov. Bush is simply trying to find out who said what, and if that hearsay evidence is sufficient to meet the 'clear and convincing' standard, IMO. The fact that there is disagreement within the family suggests that there are conflicting statements. MS himself said one thing before the malpractice award and another thing afterwards. Others said MS told them he had "no idea" what Terri would have wanted. These statements need to be examined and possibly put before a jury.
Terri's life, if taken in error, cannot be returned to her. Greer made no allowance for the possibility of error in his rulings. He disregarded important evidence which suggests that Terri's alleged wish to die does not meet the standard of 'clear and convincing.'
13
posted on
11/28/2003 12:36:24 PM PST
by
msmagoo
To: nickcarraway
Terri left no advanced directive indicating her preference for medical treatment. That should be the end of the story. If she left no specific directive requiring the removal of medical treatment then no treatment should be removed, period.
Judge Baird has been accused of being biased in the case
This evil person has made it clear he is totally biased in this case. Why hasn't the family gone to the Judicial Tenure Commission (or FL equivalent) and started proceedings to have him removed from the bench?
14
posted on
11/28/2003 1:20:10 PM PST
by
jimkress
(America has become Soviet Union Lite)
To: msmagoo
Bump.....for the good guys!
15
posted on
11/28/2003 1:22:48 PM PST
by
mickie
To: 2nd amendment mama; A2J; Alouette; aposiopetic; attagirl; axel f; Balto_Boy; Blue Scourge; ...
ProLife Ping! If anyone wants on or off my ProLife Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
16
posted on
11/28/2003 1:23:36 PM PST
by
Mr. Silverback
(Pre-empt the third murder attempt-- Pray for Terry Schiavo!)
To: mickie
Legal fireworks expected shortly!
It will be interesting to see which way Baird rules. He's leaving himself open for more allegations of bias if he rules against Bush. Bush was never a party to the previous Schindler/Schiavo proceedings, so he is entitled to request discovery as a defendant in this lawsuit.
17
posted on
11/28/2003 1:44:50 PM PST
by
msmagoo
To: jimkress
There is something dreadfully wrong with some of Florida's judges. Blackmail, pay-off, and/or mental incompetence comes to mind.
18
posted on
11/28/2003 3:21:47 PM PST
by
Dante3
To: steplock
That probably be right in most cases, but you are talking Pinellas County.
It appears that the courts amd law enforcement are in michael's back pocket.
19
posted on
11/28/2003 3:44:01 PM PST
by
sport
To: samtheman
Actually, samtheman, it is for the government to assist you in murdering your wife.
If at first you don't succeed, get yourself a shyster lawyer, crooked judge, and the alcu.
20
posted on
11/28/2003 3:46:40 PM PST
by
sport
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson