"While the troops cheered the moment, it is too soon to know whether the image of Bush in his Army jacket yesterday will become a symbol of strong leadership or a symbol of unwarranted bravado."
How can they come up with crap like this?
These are the same people who have rewritten history by insisting that the aircraft carrier landing created a negative image for the president.
They also know that Hillary was in Afghanistan for purely political purposes. She went to give anything she says about the war on terrorism some credibility.
What I think speaks very loudy, though no one in the media has pointed it out, is why would Hillary go to Afghanistan when visiting Iraq would have made a much bigger splash?