Whatever. If that fight takes the power out of the hands of the states and puts it in the hands of the national government, then she's the person you want at the front of the battle. However, if you love freedom and respect the rights of the states to maintain their internal affairs as they see fit then she's probably not the best person to pick as a leader
personaly hate to be told when I can or can not take a calculated risk. But there are more important battles to fight
Not many there aren't. Because if you allow Washington DC to tell you what is and what isn't a risk, it's not so far down the road for them to tell you what you can and cannot say or do, for fear of 'risk'
Re: abortion. I think I have a pretty good idea which way she leans
I do as well, which is another mark against her ever being a conservative