Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DustyMoment; texasbluebell; #3Fan; tpaine; justshutupandtakeit
Is there any indication that the back brace in any way affected either the velocity or trajectory of the bullet?

Many have speculated it kept the president in the sitting position making him a better target.

~~~

The President's personal physician, Dr. George Burkley, drafted the death certificate on November 23, 1963.

It stated the back wound was "at about the level of the third thoracic vertebra."

One of the autopsists, Pierre A. Finck, was questioned under oath February 24, 1969, in State of Louisiana v Clay L. Shaw:

Q Can you give me approximately how far this probe went?

A The first fraction of an inch.

~~~

Also, re-considering that the throat wound was an entry wound versus an exit wound, it might also explain why there was no spray of blood and tissue from the front of Kennedy's neck as the bullet exited.

QED the wound was one of entry.

308 posted on 11/28/2003 4:29:05 PM PST by PhilDragoo (Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 299 | View Replies ]


To: PhilDragoo
More great info. It eliminates the back brace as a culprit with respect to any of the wounds but, ironically, may have allowed additional damage to be done by preventing him from laying flat.
331 posted on 11/29/2003 9:05:45 AM PST by DustyMoment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson