To: PhilDragoo
Thanks, Phil. As I responded to texasbluebell, I tend to place more weight on the initial observations of the Parkland ER docs than on those from the official autopsy conducted at Bethesda. After having seen yours and texasbluebell's sources, I will have to reconsider my previous impression that the throat wound was an exit wound vs. and entry wound.
To: DustyMoment
Dr. CARRICO. With those facts and the fact as I understand it no other bullet was found this would be, this was, I believe, was an exit wound.
Dr. PERRY. A full jacketed bullet without deformation passing through skin would leave a similar wound for an exit and entrance wound and with the facts which yon have made available and with these assumptions, I believe that it was an exit wound.
Other doctors at Parkland Hospital who observed the wound prior to the tracheotomy agreed with the observations of Drs. Perry and Carrico.
295 posted on
11/27/2003 7:20:32 PM PST by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: DustyMoment; texasbluebell; #3Fan; justshutupandtakeit; Leatherneck_MT; tpaine; chuckwalla
The back wound was inferior to the first thoracic vertebra per the HSCA.
That wound did not penetrate beyond the first joint of the finger per the autopsists.
Thus the speculative trajectory of the Magic Bullet is moot, as its beginning was its end.
Therefore the throat wound was not its exit.
In addition, Drs. Crenshaw, Perry, Carrico, Baxter, Peters and Jones described it as small, neat, and round.
The consistent response of the Warren Commission as well as the FBI to evidence and testimony contrary to its agenda was to suppress it.
296 posted on
11/27/2003 9:35:37 PM PST by
PhilDragoo
(Hitlery: das Butch von Buchenvald)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson