To: Shooter 2.5
I'm not claiming a shooter, but my guesses would be ... .22LR/exploding round; behind the fence atop the grassy knoll ... there is testimony from a soldier who 'heard' a firearm being fired behind and to the left of this soldier. If close enough (say within ten to fifteen feet), even a .22LR suppressed round would make quite a 'whoosh' passing your head.
I'm amazed at how tenaciously believers in 'Oswald did it all' will hold to their beliefs regardless of the niggling facts. And the conspiracy theorists are amazing in how mole-hillish a fact they can expand to become mountainous. I do not believe the American public has the truth of Kennedy's death in Dallas (I was changing college classes at the time the news hit the nation). My beliefs reagrding the fcats are biased because of the news I watched for eleven straight hours that day. The interviews coming from Dallas during those first hours, of persons who were eyewitnesses, carries more weight with my credulity than the bogus WC release and a noticeably altered Zapruder film.
151 posted on
11/25/2003 6:40:49 PM PST by
MHGinTN
(If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
To: MHGinTN
Now you're claiming the Zapruder film was altered?
Did you notice that when the CT's thought the film supported them, they never once argued the film was altered?
How exactly does a lowly suppressed subsonic .22 open a man's head like a melon?
154 posted on
11/25/2003 6:48:27 PM PST by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: MHGinTN
So you have this invisible shooter at the fence with a lowly subsonic .22.
Which wounds are you claiming he made?
You do realize the soldier was nowhere near where he claimed to be, don't you?
157 posted on
11/25/2003 6:55:18 PM PST by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson