To: David
Re your Post #21- I think that we agree on this- I also think that, a generation from now, ours will be the "conventional wisdom" view (that is, that there was a limited conspiracy of some sort, but the chance to uncover it was lost with the Warren Commission cover-up).
To: RANGERAIRBORNE
I'm no fan of Peter Jennings but his 2 hour piece on ABC this past week wrapped this up in a neat bundle. Jennings also thoroughly demolished Oliver Stone's film which improperly wove actual footage of JFK's motorcade with Stone's fiction.
Too bad Jennings couldn't feel the same way about "the Reagans."
To: RANGERAIRBORNE
I think that's probably the only way this will ever be resolved in the future. To realize that there was some sort of conspiracy, but the players will remain unknown due to bungling of the WC.
The HSCA actually later determined that there was a conspiracy of some sort, and WC proponents always seem to gloss over that fact.
Why? Just because the WC came out first? Why do people ignore the HSCA report? I don't get it.
To: RANGERAIRBORNE; David
David; - Re your Post #21- I think that we agree on this- I also think that, a generation from now, ours will be the "conventional wisdom" view (that is, that there was a limited conspiracy of some sort, but the chance to uncover it was lost with the Warren Commission cover-up).
29 posted by RANGERAIRBORNE
Well said by both of you. I've been saying the same thing for over five years now at FR.
Rationality will prevail, one of these days. -- Or, -- FR will become a joke site, dedicated to the politically correct statis quo Rino view.
70 posted on
11/23/2003 10:10:46 AM PST by
tpaine
(I'm trying to be 'Mr Nice Guy', but FRs flying monkey squad brings out the Rickenbacker in me.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson