Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: #3Fan
Yes, that was Barr McClellan, a lawyer at the firm that did a lot of work for LBJ. He has come forward to implicate LBJ, although I am not sure why he waited 40 years. Anyway, he was on this morning, doing a long talk promoting his theory. I'm not sure there is anything there, but since I always hated LBJ I am interested to see where this leads.

What WOULD happen if it could be proven beyond doubt that LBJ was up to his bushy eyebrows in this thing?

I honestly don't know- I suspect that there would be no possible level of proof that would convince diehard Democrats, and it would break down along Party lines, like everything else in this country.

189 posted on 11/23/2003 5:34:24 PM PST by RANGERAIRBORNE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]


To: RANGERAIRBORNE
Yes, that was Barr McClellan, a lawyer at the firm that did a lot of work for LBJ. He has come forward to implicate LBJ, although I am not sure why he waited 40 years.

Fear! They killed many in the 60s and 70s who knew the truth. He may think it's safe now.

Anyway, he was on this morning, doing a long talk promoting his theory. I'm not sure there is anything there, but since I always hated LBJ I am interested to see where this leads.

I think there is a lot there. I never knew who did it, I never thought LBJ did. But the indentification of convicted killer Mac Wallace's print in the sniper's nest and the ownership of the building by Byrd and his actions, both LBJ pals, makes it obvious to me.

What WOULD happen if it could be proven beyond doubt that LBJ was up to his bushy eyebrows in this thing?

We already know that he killed Marshall and nothing happened. Democrats would poo poo it and the media would call it ridiculous and that would be the end of it. And that is what is happening.

I honestly don't know- I suspect that there would be no possible level of proof that would convince diehard Democrats, and it would break down along Party lines, like everything else in this country.

I respectfully disagree. This is like a sports team to a lot of people. People have their beliefs and they're wedded to them, it doesn't matter what evidence you show them. They can't change their mind about the JFK assassination because it would prove to themselves that they were wrong about something important.

211 posted on 11/23/2003 6:14:35 PM PST by #3Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 189 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson