[Sapper26]

I looked at the link and noticed that the HSCA also stated:

1. Oswald fired 3 times. (According to conspiracists that's impossible given the type of rifle in time required).

2. Oswald hit JFK from behind on the 2nd. (I notice nothing mentioned about the Connelly injuries. So did the HSCA believe the "magic bullet"?)

3. The 3rd shot FIRED FROM BEHIND killed JFK. (Impossible according to conspiracists - back and to the left.)

So if there was a 2nd shooter - What, if anything, did he hit?

[texasbluebell]

I have no idea. No one knows, at least no one who is talking.

But the HSCA determination does question the WC findings.

That's all I can say. I just have many unanswered questions, as do the majority of Americans.

[tpaine]

texasbluebell, thanks for the link.

Sapper: I looked at the link and noticed that the HSCA also stated:
1. Oswald fired 3 times. (According to conspiracists that's impossible given the type of rifle in time required).

You misstated. Not impossible to fire, - impossible as per the Reports single bullet theory.

2. Oswald hit JFK from behind on the 2nd. (I notice nothing mentioned about the Connelly injuries. So did the HSCA believe the "magic bullet"?)

Good question..

3. The 3rd shot FIRED FROM BEHIND killed JFK. (Impossible according to conspiracists - back and to the left.)

Again, not impossible, but back/left was improbable with a FMJ type bullet. Expansive type bullets are very liable to cause such reactions.

So if there was a 2nd shooter - What, if anything, did he hit?

The only thing we are 'sure' of, according to the Report itself, is that the so-called pristine FMJ bullet hit Connelly. All else is theory. Badly written and reasoned Commission theory. Read the Report.