To: VeritatisSplendor
OK, this is certainly an improvement. Can you please cite an official source that Wallace's fingerprint was in the School Book Depository, and a basis for your assertion that LBJ had a "hitman"?. On whose say-so are you relying?The fox was in charge of the henhouse so all evidence that pointed to conspiracy was ignored by officialdom. The Mac Wallace print was the only print unidentified until recently. With LBJ's attourney now letting the truth out, Mac Wallace became a suspect. Being that he was a convicted killer, his prints were on file. They were compared and it was a match. It was on the History Channel. You probably refused to watch though, huh?
150 posted on
11/23/2003 3:16:06 PM PST by
#3Fan
To: #3Fan
They were compared and it was a match. ,p> Who said they were a match? Was this the FBI fingerprint lab or the say-so of an author trying to sell more books?
177 posted on
11/23/2003 5:00:37 PM PST by
FreedomCalls
(It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
To: #3Fan
So a single expert claims an unidentified print at the TSBD belongs to one "Mac Wallace", but official experts say no. Fair enough, this is the kind of thing which can be resolved, the two prints ought to be available for all to see. I'm not a fingerprint expert, so I would hope that Mr. Darby has found some other professional fingerprint analysts to agree with him. I searched the Web and could not find clear pictures of the two prints which were supposed to be matched, just a superposition of the two which is much less interpretable.
But you have still not explained why the involvement of Mac Wallace implicates LBJ. What is the documentation of the connection between LBJ and Wallace? Is it also the say-so of a single individual, or are there multiple sources who say Wallace worked for LBJ?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson