Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DaGman
I'll never believe this until things like the "magic bullet" and why Kennedy's head moved backwards when he was shot from behind are explained satisfactorily in relation to Oswald acting alone.

Every time it is explained satisfactorily to you, you ignore it.

Go read this web page and follow the links. Then come back here and explain what is preventing you from accepting the single bullet fact (fact -- not theory).

113 posted on 11/23/2003 12:05:03 PM PST by FreedomCalls (It's the "Statue of Liberty," not the "Statue of Security.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]


To: FreedomCalls
Go read this web page and follow the links. Then come back here and explain what is preventing you from accepting the single bullet fact (fact -- not theory).

There's a lot there to talk about at that link, much less refute in the limited space here. Nor do I have the wealth of arguments available at hand to extensively refute everything there. Volumes have been written arguing both points of view. However, this graphic says it all:

For Connally to be hit by the same bullet he would have been sitting much further to the left when he turned to look behind him.

I don't believe Oswald was the lone gunman. But I do think he was one of more than one gunmen. I also think he fired at least 2 (of a possible 4) shots at Kennedy, at least one of which hit Kennedy. Probably the one where he holds his throat. I think he probably missed JFK and hit Connally with a second shot. However, I think the headshot came from another gunman standing behind the grassy knoll.

127 posted on 11/23/2003 1:53:51 PM PST by DaGman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson