Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ex-Dem
The M-16 combines the size of a full size battle rifle with the knock down power power of a submachine gun and a range that splits the difference. That means its combines the worst features of battle rifles and submachine guns.

If the Army is going to make infantry drag around a full size rifle it might as well give them a cartridge of at least .308.

If the Army is going to send everybody who rides around in vehicles into battle with weapon with modest range and knock down power, they might as well make it short and handy and shoot .45 or 9mm. I saw a photo from this year of a Special Forces vehicle manned by soldiers armed with Sterlings. These are basically upgraded Stens, in 9mm, issued by the Brits in the 1950s to eveybody who didn't get a full size rifle.

What ever new weapons that are adopted need to be at least as rugged the AK-47.

59 posted on 11/22/2003 2:59:24 PM PST by Pilsner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Pilsner
Define "modest range"? The 5.56 is moderately efective out to maybe 500 yds. The 9mm is not very effective out to maybe 100 yds.
69 posted on 11/22/2003 3:14:11 PM PST by Hugin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson