Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lady Eileen
Glad I'm not the only one. This just sounded odd, as though Rush was superimposing the MJ defense on his own situation.
53 posted on 11/21/2003 12:14:12 PM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: LS
There was a private eye named Rizzo on Fox this morning. He did some of the investigation in the case back in 93.

He went into detail on that boy's testimony (if you will remember it had anatomical details that were verified by photographing Jackson nude) and said he has NO DOUBT that Jackson is a pedophile.

He further said that Jackson's MO was to look for single mothers in financial distress who could be easily duped into acquiescing to his requests.

And, let us not forget that we have seen many, many instances where parents have sold their children as sex toys for drugs, cash, etc.

And even if the mother did give her approval, that does not negate the crime. No one has the right to approve an illegal act on one's child.

54 posted on 11/21/2003 12:27:09 PM PST by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson