Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Solson
I agree. Look, everyone brings up Richard Jewell---a travesty, no doubt. But with MJ we have a damn record. It may not be a "criminal" record, but it is clear to anyone except a one-eyed cleric like Mullah Omar that MJ is a pervert of titanic proportions, and that he in fact enjoys flaunting his pedophilia with the attitude that he is "above the law." (Stephen Seagall---not a bad film).

Ultimately, letting O.J. walk didn't result in any more deaths . . . so far. It certainly didn't do justice for those he killed. But MJ will certainly strike again, and the fact that his "fans" are already supporting him says a great deal about what to expect from parents in the future.

51 posted on 11/21/2003 12:08:57 PM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: LS
I thought the facts in '93 were in Jackson's favor but he settled becuase the family wouldn't let the case drop?

The prosecutor took several pictures of Jackson's Johnson (I just had to type that) and it contradicted the "victim's" testimony. So they did not pursue a criminal case.

It could be I just don't remember.
63 posted on 11/21/2003 1:59:03 PM PST by <1/1,000,000th%
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson