[elli1]

"Evidence" is a lame excuse for the cops to keep the money. One stack of bills is like any other stack of bills. Other reports indicate this cash is the proceeds of Scott selling his golf club membership. This is like confiscating someone's paycheck.

[cyncooper]

"Evidence" is a lame excuse for the cops to keep the money. One stack of bills is like any other stack of bills. Other reports indicate this cash is the proceeds of Scott selling his golf club membership. This is like confiscating someone's paycheck.

"Evidence" is a lame excuse? Only if it isn't evidence, which in this case it is.

Evidence that he was planning to flee, when considered in context of the vehicle he was in, how he acquired the vehicle, the ID he had, his hair, etc, etc.

If he's acquitted (cough) he'll get the money back. If it really is his.

[runningbear]

Well depends... depends on siezure and probability of show flight risks. Also, sure they could return the funds, after they check the serials, and photograph the loot! (which I am sure they have already done!) :o)