[WackyKat]

The story hasn't been told yet, y'know. We all have something to hide, and Rush's money withdrawals may have been hiding something quite legitimate. If it's a legal use for the money, he has the right to keep it secret.

I saw exactly the same denial and excuses when the story of Rush's drug use broke:

"It's all a conspiracy!"

"Rush never used illegal drugs"

Rush had a good reason for using narcotics"

Rush is not an addict!

And those people were all wrong, weren't they?

[TomB]

I saw exactly the same denial and excuses when the story of Rush's drug use broke:

One major difference:

When the drug story broke, Limbaugh didn't comment on the story other than to say he couldn't say anyting. Here, he spelled out the entire story.

[Area51]

And those people were all wrong, weren't they?


75 posted on 11/19/2003 10:01 AM PST by WackyKat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies | Report Abuse ]

---

Not being a great fan of Rush I don't deny that there were plenty of excuses, however seeing you are the one in the know, how about you spell out all the facts pertaining to the charges.

Roy Black will be particulary interested. Given that neither he nor his client has made any public statements reagarding them.

[Frank_Discussion]

My point is that the story has not been told, and we are supposed to think INNOCENT UNTIL PROVEN GUILTY. The drugs he may or may not have been getting illegally don't even cost the amount of money indicated, either, so linking an innuendo (illegal purchase) with another (money laundering) isn't even a logical path.

For myself, I made no proclamations that he wasn't an addict, but was hoping that he was clean. Sadly, my hopes were dashed.