[TruBluKentuckian]

"You are the one who is closed about it. You insist that it was some kind of conspiracy and you are not open to the possibility that it wasn't."

Where did I "insist" there was a conspiracy? Don't put words in my mouth. While I am open to debate on the subject, you refuse to debate it, resorting to name calling and accusing other people (those who dare to think) of being close minded.

It is YOU who is close minded. It is YOU who "insists" there WASN'T a conspiracy. Since you are trying to prove a negative, the burden of proof is on you.

[Az Joe]

No I have not "insisted" there was not a conspiracy. I said that based on what I have seen I believe that there was no conspiracy. If new evidence comes forward or new technological means to examine old evidence I would be open to it.

The simplest explanation to me is that Oswald did it, alone.