To: texasbluebell
Apparently because you are getting your information from cheap tabloids instead of using common sense. Are you saying that Kennedy had a bullet hole in his throat and another on his back and no bullets were removed because they evaporated?
The emergency doctors weren't interested in tracing bullet paths. They were trying to save his life or at least go through the motions.
69 posted on
11/19/2003 8:46:26 AM PST by
Shooter 2.5
(Don't punch holes in the lifeboat)
To: Shooter 2.5
Apparently because you are getting your information from cheap tabloids instead of using common sense. Uh, no, I am not. I thought I said that these were video interviews with the very ER docs who attended JFK.
They know what they saw, and no amount of spinning is going to change that.
To: Shooter 2.5
All hands at parkland stated that the throat wound was an entrance wound and was opened up for a tracheotomy - that is to insert a breathing apparatus to aid in reviving Kennedy if possible. This information was relayed to Hume at the time of the autopsy. And all the eyewitness testimony in both cases state there was an entrance wound in the right temple and the back of the head was blown out. They also state that bullet paths were not traced in the autopsy. So I'm not sure where you're going.
209 posted on
11/20/2003 8:53:17 PM PST by
Havoc
(If you can't be frank all the time are you lying the rest of the time?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson