To: steve8714
Bonds was simply better than Pujols. He had more HRsThere is no regional bias. Bonds had more HR's in about 200 fewer at bats and he had a much higher OBP% and SLG%. Just looking at the numbers you'd have to give it to Bonds. Oh yeah, and his team didnt suck.
27 posted on
11/18/2003 11:55:25 AM PST by
Blackyce
(President Jacques Chirac: "As far as I'm concerned, war always means failure.")
To: Blackyce
I didn't say regional bias...hell, the beat writer here voted for Sheffield. I said laziness.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson