Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: apackof2
Both are needed

I disagree. I think fundamentalists just can't stand the idea of homosexual unions being legalized because it undermines the status of their religious beliefs.

Besides, proposing a constitutional amendmant to address a niche cultural issue has a very liberal slant.
65 posted on 11/18/2003 9:38:16 AM PST by Belial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: Belial
Besides, proposing a constitutional amendmant to address a niche cultural issue has a very liberal slant.

A 'niche cultural issue'? Wow, is that some serious spin.

68 posted on 11/18/2003 9:40:25 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: Belial
niche cultural issue

It's a large niche, but even so we shouldn't modify the Constitution.

73 posted on 11/18/2003 9:49:51 AM PST by RightWhale (Close your tag lines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: Belial
The liberals dont need constitutional amendments as much these days. They just get liberal justices to invent the rights they are calling for.

The real solution is to impeach these judicial tyrants and return the rule of law to its proper meaning. Dont you agree?

we shouldnt need a constitutional amendment to say what the laws on the books are already saying, dont you agree?

"I think fundamentalists just can't stand the idea of homosexual unions being legalized because it undermines the status of their religious beliefs. "

where do you get the nutty idea its only 'fundamentalist' that want to protect marriage? Certainly, the militant secularists cant stand the idea of traditionalism being preserved because it undermines the status of their deviancy. But I wouldnt suggest that is in any way an argument for or against their ideas!


79 posted on 11/18/2003 10:01:42 AM PST by WOSG (The only thing that will defeat us is defeatism itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: Belial
Ya know we could argue and argue but what good would it do

You obviously have decided not to accept that Jesus is really who he saids he is,or the true of Scripture therefore you will never understand the spiritual implications and consequences of same sex marriage on this culture or country

Hope someday you let go of your god of logic and science
It has no power to save

84 posted on 11/18/2003 10:15:20 AM PST by apackof2 (Watch and pray till you see Him coming, no one knows the hour or the day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: Belial
I think fundamentalists just can't stand the idea of homosexual unions being legalized because it undermines the status of their religious beliefs.


Admit it, your queer. Only queers use the argument of "fundamentalism" to try and rationalize the average persons loathing of queers. I'm surprised you didn't use the term "fundie" -- they love to throw that one around.
109 posted on 11/18/2003 11:08:56 AM PST by richtig_faust
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: Belial
Tinkering with social behavior worked so well the last time it was handled by Constitutional amendment, I can't imagine why anybody would object to such a change now.

[eye rolling sarcasm]

146 posted on 11/18/2003 11:51:05 AM PST by Chancellor Palpatine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson