To: apackof2
Both are needed
I disagree. I think fundamentalists just can't stand the idea of homosexual unions being legalized because it undermines the status of their religious beliefs.
Besides, proposing a constitutional amendmant to address a niche cultural issue has a very liberal slant.
65 posted on
11/18/2003 9:38:16 AM PST by
Belial
To: Belial
Besides, proposing a constitutional amendmant to address a niche cultural issue has a very liberal slant. A 'niche cultural issue'? Wow, is that some serious spin.
To: Belial
niche cultural issue It's a large niche, but even so we shouldn't modify the Constitution.
73 posted on
11/18/2003 9:49:51 AM PST by
RightWhale
(Close your tag lines)
To: Belial
The liberals dont need constitutional amendments as much these days. They just get liberal justices to invent the rights they are calling for.
The real solution is to impeach these judicial tyrants and return the rule of law to its proper meaning. Dont you agree?
we shouldnt need a constitutional amendment to say what the laws on the books are already saying, dont you agree?
"I think fundamentalists just can't stand the idea of homosexual unions being legalized because it undermines the status of their religious beliefs. "
where do you get the nutty idea its only 'fundamentalist' that want to protect marriage? Certainly, the militant secularists cant stand the idea of traditionalism being preserved because it undermines the status of their deviancy. But I wouldnt suggest that is in any way an argument for or against their ideas!
79 posted on
11/18/2003 10:01:42 AM PST by
WOSG
(The only thing that will defeat us is defeatism itself)
To: Belial
Ya know we could argue and argue but what good would it do
You obviously have decided not to accept that Jesus is really who he saids he is,or the true of Scripture therefore you will never understand the spiritual implications and consequences of same sex marriage on this culture or country
Hope someday you let go of your god of logic and science
It has no power to save
84 posted on
11/18/2003 10:15:20 AM PST by
apackof2
(Watch and pray till you see Him coming, no one knows the hour or the day)
To: Belial
I think fundamentalists just can't stand the idea of homosexual unions being legalized because it undermines the status of their religious beliefs.
Admit it, your queer. Only queers use the argument of "fundamentalism" to try and rationalize the average persons loathing of queers. I'm surprised you didn't use the term "fundie" -- they love to throw that one around.
To: Belial
Tinkering with social behavior worked so well the last time it was handled by Constitutional amendment, I can't imagine why anybody would object to such a change now.
[eye rolling sarcasm]
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson