Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rudypoot
The constitution is about limiting government and recognition of our natural rights, not about social issues. Marriage is not a right, it's a privilege. If you want a specific definition of marriage then get congress to pass a federal law.

The problem is we have courts that are usurping power. The Mass. Legislature DID pass a specific definition, and the Court just threw it out. There is a decent chance the same thing will happen to the just passed Partial-birth abortion ban. We must find issues that we increase our power so we can reign in the Judicial Branch. Until we reduce the number of activist judges, the power of the legislature is worthless. We have lost our system of checks and balances.

43 posted on 11/18/2003 9:02:47 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Always Right
The problem is we have courts that are usurping power. The Mass. Legislature DID pass a specific definition, and the Court just threw it out.

Consider this: Let's assume for the sake of discussion that the Mass. Legislature passed a law allowing marriage between any two or more consenting adults of legal age. And the Mass. Supremes did the same thing - threw it out as unconstitutional (tho how they'd arrive at such a decision is beyond me, unless they had a constitutional amendment banning gay marriage and polygamy).

Anyway, assume they threw it out. Would you view such an action as a usurpation of the Legislature's power? If no, why not? Be specific.

Snidely

159 posted on 11/18/2003 12:06:23 PM PST by Snidely Whiplash
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson