[Dimensio]

Don't bother, most atheists would not deign to soil them selves with such an "erudite" suggestion.

Or perhaps many of us have already seen it and realised that it's not quite as sound as you think that it is.

Why do you always asume that your proofs are "infallable" and that people who don't agree with them just haven't read them?

[semaj]

"Why do you always asume that your proofs are "infallable" and that people who don't agree with them just haven't read them?"

My proofs? They are anything but. Atheists seem to have a problem with acknowledging the self-proclaimed truths that abound, and instead seek complex explanations that rely on fantastic and often fabricated evidence. Sometimes the answer to a question is the most obvious and simple, and that is where atheists have difficulty. It has nothing to do with a lack of evidence, but an abundance of pride and arrogance in refusing to acknowledge the simple truth right in front of their faces.