Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
You have me confused with someone else. I never said that it is impossible for someone behind Kennedy to be hit by spray. I've said about a dozen times that someone behind JFK WAS hit with spray AND blood AND brain.

And where did you get the notion that the kill shot that hit Kennedy's head or any shot for that matter came from a downward angle? The autopsy photos show a rather level shot. Perhaps you're only assuming a downward angle by assuming that Oswald was the one and only gunman and he was shooting from the Depository. I think that the kill shot was pretty close to a 90 degree angle, although it could have been slightly upward or downward from the front.
139 posted on 11/17/2003 4:37:14 AM PST by Iwo Jima
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies ]


To: Iwo Jima
I THINK that supporters of the official version went into some detail as to how Kennedy had to be leaning forward when hit.
I also THINK that the commission simply didn't address the odd trajectories necessary to pull it off as they deemed to have happened.
Of course, in the film he is upright until the first hit and I THINK that he does not bend forward because of the brace.

All of which, like the rest of the debate, is based on thin air because the Kennedy family and a collection of "inept" doctors, police, SS agents, firepersons and the neighbor's cat managed to destroy/hide/contaminate/misplace the evidence.

And, to Laredo in post 138; LBJ was widely and often pointed to as most likely source behind any conspiracy.
Ol' Lyndon wasn't too popular with the democrat party after the end of "Camelot".

173 posted on 11/17/2003 1:14:31 PM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson