[Badray]

"...shoot youself and stab the rest of us in the back to prove your point..."

No! To teach them (Bush and every other pol who wants to disarm us) that there is a price to be paid for their treachery.

If you reward your so-called friends who violate your rights, how can you condemn your opponents when they do the same thing?

Rights are non-negotiable or didn't you know that?

If I want to steal all of your money and you didn't want me to take any of it, would you compromise with me by letting me steal half of it?

[Consort]

No! To teach them (Bush and every other pol who wants to disarm us) that there is a price to be paid for their treachery.

How do you teach them a lesson without screwing things up for everybody? If Bush is not reelected, then who gets to be President and what will that person do for you? In '92 Bush 41 was not reelected because you wanted to "teach him a lesson"...and look what happened.

[The_Eaglet]

If I want to steal all of your money and you didn't want me to take any of it, would you compromise with me by letting me steal half of it?

You have added another good analogy to describe Bush's intentions to allow continue legislation that infringes on the right to bear arms, therefore violating the Supreme Law of the Land.

Geritol also pointed out the fallacy of voting for those who campaign to usurp to a less extreme than others in #265.