Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Howlin
McLame is one who opposes the nuclear option.
6,607 posted on 11/14/2003 7:17:05 AM PST by jackbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6597 | View Replies ]


To: jackbill
Nickles is said to be another.
6,609 posted on 11/14/2003 7:17:25 AM PST by Dianna
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6607 | View Replies ]

To: jackbill
I despise that man.
6,621 posted on 11/14/2003 7:20:15 AM PST by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6607 | View Replies ]

To: jackbill
I think we lost the opportunity to go "nuclear" on this when we allowed it to be called the "nuclear option".

In reality it just means that we want to take the Senate Rules back to a Contitutionally defensible set of rules. I think the time to do this is in January 2005 after the new Congress is set, hopefully after a bunch of additional Dem Senators are thrown out of office, including Tom Daschle.
6,868 posted on 11/14/2003 8:26:56 AM PST by RobFromGa (The Bush Recovery Is In Full Swing....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6607 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson