Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: milemark
Flynt has the pictures of Jessica, says he won't publish them--but will he turn the pictures and negatives over to Jessica so she can destroy them? Naw, that'd be too nice--and Flynt has to squeeze every ounce of publicity out of this.
24 posted on 11/11/2003 4:24:22 AM PST by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: Catspaw
The pics were without a clear view of the face anyway, so it could have been anyone. He would have been sued blue if he published them and labeled them as Lynch. This way he gets a load of publicity and makes himself look like a good guy, at least to some suckers, even though the whole story was bunk from the beginning. The British tabloids rejected those same photos because they couldn't be identified.
25 posted on 11/11/2003 4:35:00 AM PST by milemark (Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is conspiracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson