Flynt's a Democrat, isn't he?
1 posted on
11/11/2003 1:09:19 AM PST by
kattracks
To: kattracks
2 posted on
11/11/2003 1:13:19 AM PST by
kattracks
To: kattracks
Flynt is one of the most despicable creatures on this planet...and yes, if I remember correctly, he's a Democrat.
3 posted on
11/11/2003 1:16:58 AM PST by
DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
(Hard work never killed anyone, but why take a chance?)
To: kattracks
This entire affair is so, um, so, American. It's befitting of our lack of seriousness and endless desire for meaningless entertainment.
Maybe we need to get hammered again by the ragheads before we wake up.
4 posted on
11/11/2003 1:20:00 AM PST by
zarf
(..where lieth those little things with the sort of raffia work base that has an attachment?)
To: kattracks
Yes he is. He and Clinton both give Flynt credit for saving Scumbag from conviction in the Senate.
6 posted on
11/11/2003 1:30:44 AM PST by
doug from upland
(Why aren't the Clintons living out their remaining years on Alcatraz?)
To: kattracks
Flynt is a very partisan Democrat who is called upon from time to time by Clinton, McAuliffe, and company.
He's no small fry within the Communist Wing of the Democratic Party, and that's no pun.
8 posted on
11/11/2003 1:52:18 AM PST by
Maelstrom
(To prevent misinterpretation or abuse of the Constitution:The Bill of Rights limits government power)
To: kattracks; All
Here ya go, everybody. Flynt now says he just bought the pics to keep them from ever being published. Can anyone say "publicity stunt?"
"I was offered photos of Jessica Lynch. I purchased them in order to keep them out of circulation, not to publish them," Flynt, publisher of Hustler magazine, said in a statement read by a publicist.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,102736,00.html
15 posted on
11/11/2003 3:28:23 AM PST by
milemark
(Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is conspiracy.)
To: kattracks
Funny how they couldn't get a face shot.
So much for claims that liberals are for Lynch. Liberals have been bashing her since April. They hate this rescue.
19 posted on
11/11/2003 3:36:35 AM PST by
#3Fan
To: B4Ranch
How's that for unit cohesion?
21 posted on
11/11/2003 3:56:33 AM PST by
Huck
To: kattracks
I think Flynt's a total f-ing scumbag, but I find this humorous.
To: kattracks
And I love how Mort Zuckerman's Daily News is SO above this "unspeakable" exploitation of her. Why, didn't they have their "exclusive" screaming front page THEY RAPED JESSICA only three days ago?
Funny how they're getting tips from publishers and the likes of Larry Flynt instead of their competition, the Murdoch-owned Post. You smellin' Rats?
37 posted on
11/11/2003 5:08:50 AM PST by
Jhensy
To: kattracks
okay, who's got 'em?
To: kattracks
Too bad the shooter only left Larry Flynt in a wheel chair. The world could do without him.
To: kattracks
I don't doubt for one second the pics exist.
This is just one more example of how placing women in combat roles is just not working.
Jessica sought to make a million (or two) off of this - now she's finding out what it is going to cost her in terms of personal privacy and happiness.
Hope she enjoys her money.
43 posted on
11/11/2003 5:51:17 AM PST by
Happy2BMe
(Nurture terrorism in a neighborhood near you - donate to your local community mosque.)
To: kattracks
What does it do for unit cohesion and military readiness when one grunt is posing topless to tittilate her pals?
48 posted on
11/11/2003 7:35:53 AM PST by
Atlas Sneezed
(Police officials view armed citizens like teachers union bosses view homeschoolers.)
To: kattracks
Interesting how the Daily News claims that Flynt will publish them...without actually attributing the statement to him in any way, through press statement or actual recorded conversation. Read the other thread on this here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1019175/posts from the New York Post and you get the completely different story that Flynt bought them to keep them from being run.
Who really runs the Daily News? I know the Post is a Murdoch production...not surprisingly it actually tells the truth there.
To: kattracks
Is there anyone who hasn't pose nude for photos?
53 posted on
11/11/2003 8:24:52 AM PST by
biblewonk
(I must answer all bible questions.)
To: kattracks
Someday, Flynt will have to explain his actions to Someone who doesnt recognize the 1st Ammendment as a reason for living such a hateful life...
54 posted on
11/11/2003 8:25:52 AM PST by
cardinal4
(Hillary and Clark rhymes with Ft Marcy park...)
To: kattracks
This is really disgusting! It makes my stomach turn! This kid will have head problems and I hope the VA will give her quality mental health care. Women should not be in combat zones. Period. I'm a Mother and I served in the Navy in the early '80's. Would you allow your daughter's to serve in combat zones to be raped by the enemy? Then be molested by Larry Flynt and the anti-war crowd? She is only a naive twenty year old and she is already putting down the war effort. Please read Nov 11th article, "Lynch Book Says Iraqi Doctors Were Saviors," by Erin McClam-AP. This political correctness has to stop at the Pentagon. The feminist had their golden experiment and they're doing more harm than good. Please sign a petition to President Bush to stop putting women in the front lines. www.americansforthemilitary.com (Center for Military Readiness)
56 posted on
11/11/2003 9:24:49 AM PST by
Milligan
To: kattracks
the Lynch book and movie "should have been an honest portrayal of her role in the war. Everyone wanted a hero from this war." Agreed, and the Pentagon should not have attempted to manufacture one. There are plenty of real ones out there, Col. West and Pfc. Patrick Miller among them.
As far as Lynch's photos are concerned, I guess she's learning the hard way that running around naked with dudes with cameras isn't exactly the smartest idea.
67 posted on
11/11/2003 11:00:13 AM PST by
Mr. Mojo
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson