Skip to comments.
Jessica's Hustled - Porn mag to run topless pics of G.I.
New York Daily News ^
| 11/11/03
| GEORGE RUSH
Posted on 11/11/2003 1:09:19 AM PST by kattracks
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
To: B4Ranch
How's that for unit cohesion?
21
posted on
11/11/2003 3:56:33 AM PST
by
Huck
To: NYCVirago
First off, this guy has claimed to have photos many times when he had nothing. (Thinking of a Presidential candidate dancing nude on top of a bar in a nightclub?)
Second, the descriptions he gives suggest these were not "posed" shots.
Third, if true, they belong to the US Army until they are properly released ~ because, according to the story, they were taken inside a military reservation. Rumsfeld himself would have to have handed them over.
Somebody better hope this is just another Larry Flynt BS job.
22
posted on
11/11/2003 4:04:05 AM PST
by
muawiyah
To: muawiyah
"Larry Flynt B.S. job"You got it. Flynt is attempting to grab a peice the Lynch media circus. Hours after claiming to plan to publish these, he now says he bought the photos to sit on them. Photos that couldn't be positively identified anyway.
"I was offered photos of Jessica Lynch. I purchased them in order to keep them out of circulation, not to publish them," Flynt, publisher of Hustler magazine, said in a statement read by a publicist.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,102736,00.html
23
posted on
11/11/2003 4:12:44 AM PST
by
milemark
(Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is conspiracy.)
To: milemark
Flynt has the pictures of Jessica, says he won't publish them--but will he turn the pictures and negatives over to Jessica so she can destroy them? Naw, that'd be too nice--and Flynt has to squeeze every ounce of publicity out of this.
24
posted on
11/11/2003 4:24:22 AM PST
by
Catspaw
To: Catspaw
The pics were without a clear view of the face anyway, so it could have been anyone. He would have been sued blue if he published them and labeled them as Lynch. This way he gets a load of publicity and makes himself look like a good guy, at least to some suckers, even though the whole story was bunk from the beginning. The British tabloids rejected those same photos because they couldn't be identified.
25
posted on
11/11/2003 4:35:00 AM PST
by
milemark
(Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is conspiracy.)
To: milemark
Flynt is a bigger slimeball than what I previously thought--and I thought he was a huge slimeball before. What a bottom-dwelling slug.
26
posted on
11/11/2003 4:40:47 AM PST
by
Catspaw
To: Catspaw
What more can be said? How low can he go? I shudder to think about it.
27
posted on
11/11/2003 4:47:43 AM PST
by
milemark
(Once is happenstance. Twice is coincidence. Three times is conspiracy.)
To: DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet
The lovely thing is that these are usually faked photos.
28
posted on
11/11/2003 4:48:45 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
(Pittsburgh beat Virginia Tech 31-28. Panthers rule!!".)
To: Catspaw
Hey! We resent that!
29
posted on
11/11/2003 4:49:55 AM PST
by
AnAmericanMother
(. . . sed, ut scis, quis homines huiusmodi intellegere potest?. . .)
To: kattracks
I think Flynt's a total f-ing scumbag, but I find this humorous.
To: Maelstrom
Flynt is a very partisan Democrat who is called upon from time to time by Clinton, McAuliffe, and company. Good point. We need to hang the Democrats up by their feet and beat them with Larry Flynt.
31
posted on
11/11/2003 4:51:52 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
(Pittsburgh beat Virginia Tech 31-28. Panthers rule!!".)
To: jaime1959
32
posted on
11/11/2003 4:54:29 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
(Pittsburgh beat Virginia Tech 31-28. Panthers rule!!".)
To: milemark
First Flynt announces plans to publish the pics, then after getting the front page of the NY Daily Spews, he says he bought the pics to bury them? How much did he pay for the pics? I'll bet it was for a lot less than the price of a full front page ad in the NY Daily snooze. He may be scum, but he is smart scum.
33
posted on
11/11/2003 4:59:26 AM PST
by
jaykay
(Proud to be an Infidel)
To: NYCVirago
I have to agree with you. She willingly posed for these photos. It's not like she was filmed in the shower by a hidden camera. She made the decision to have herself photographed in an undressed state, and she has to live with it.
To: jaykay
I believe Flint is blackmailing Ms. Lych.
It sounded so strange to read the statements Ms. Lynch has been making. The exploitation of her rescue parrots the left-wing anti-US retoric.
Say what I want or I publish the pics
35
posted on
11/11/2003 5:02:21 AM PST
by
Republican Red
(Karmic hugs welcomed!)
To: ought-six
"She willingly posed for these photos."Actually, the photos cannot be positively identified as her and flynt has backed off.
36
posted on
11/11/2003 5:06:15 AM PST
by
jaykay
(Proud to be an Infidel)
To: kattracks
And I love how Mort Zuckerman's Daily News is SO above this "unspeakable" exploitation of her. Why, didn't they have their "exclusive" screaming front page THEY RAPED JESSICA only three days ago?
Funny how they're getting tips from publishers and the likes of Larry Flynt instead of their competition, the Murdoch-owned Post. You smellin' Rats?
37
posted on
11/11/2003 5:08:50 AM PST
by
Jhensy
To: Yeti
Agreed. Hysteria, Histrionics, Decadence and Degeneration. The Four Pillars of present day Western Civilization.
38
posted on
11/11/2003 5:19:46 AM PST
by
AEMILIUS PAULUS
(Further, the statement assumed)
To: milemark
From the Fox News piece:
"I was offered photos of Jessica Lynch. I purchased them in order to keep them out of circulation, not to publish them," Flynt, publisher of Hustler magazine, said in a statement read by a publicist.
Yeah, I believe this.
To: milemark
Did you hear Al queda Gore's speech about repealing the Patriot Act? If a 'rat gets in the White House, you can count on it doing just that.If a Dem gets power they will use the Patriot Act provisions to go after their political enimies, not America's enemies.
40
posted on
11/11/2003 5:24:33 AM PST
by
Poincare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-75 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson