Replies

>>Maybe the P.I wasn't looking for this data/information(s) ? Maybe they were looking else-where ?

I would think after 13 years they'd have covered everything. What we have dug up on the internet is probably all known, and much better known, by the Schindlers.

Michael Schiavo's adultery in recent years is acknowledged and beyond dispute. But if as some say, he has another child from a relationship that existed prior to Terri's collapse, that fact would argue against his claim to having been, from the start, only a loving and devoted husband.
It would prove him a liar once again, and add to all we have that speaks against him.
But either the Schindlers don't want to use it, or it's not true. Personally I feel it's not true, because it's been 13 years and all we really have is an accusation from someone who is suddenly "not at liberty" to say any more.

Then he should be charged with at least 3 counts...
Make him waste more time and atty $$ on fighting that
too, etc..open up another legal front, the more the better...

I wonder why he killed her kittens (cats) ?
and melted her weddings,hmm?

MS starved his own father to death "before" he starved his own mother to death. Now we know his mother was against Terri being starved to death. But did his mother want her husband starved to death? Did his mother sign over guardianship of her husband to her MS?

But if as some say, he has another child from a relationship that existed prior to Terri's collapse, that fact would argue against his claim to having been, from the start, only a loving and devoted husband.

It would prove him a liar once again, and add to all we have that speaks against him.

You seem to believe that they've always had access to Michael's private life....I find that hard to believe considering they have no access to their daughter's. In the beginning they believed he loved her and they didn't pursue any information to the contray. Why would they?

But either the Schindlers don't want to use it, or it's not true. Personally I feel it's not true, because it's been 13 years and all we really have is an accusation from someone who is suddenly "not at liberty" to say any more.

Have you considered the possibility that it is true but they don't have proof that a court would consider? Think about this...there are two women who have come forward, both have been harrassed,they're so afraid they sign affidavits but won't go to court...now we have a woman with 1 or 2 children and no one hears a word from her (and you wonder why??)

But if as some say, he has another child from a relationship that existed prior to Terri's collapse, that fact would argue against his claim to having been, from the start, only a loving and devoted husband.

It would prove him a liar once again, and add to all we have that speaks against him.

You seem to believe that they've always had access to Michael's private life....I find that hard to believe considering they have no access to their daughter's. In the beginning they believed he loved her and they didn't pursue any information to the contray. Why would they?

But either the Schindlers don't want to use it, or it's not true. Personally I feel it's not true, because it's been 13 years and all we really have is an accusation from someone who is suddenly "not at liberty" to say any more.

Have you considered the possibility that it is true but they don't have proof that a court would consider? Think about this...there are two women who have come forward, both have been harrassed, they're so afraid they sign affidavits but won't go to court...now we have a woman with 1 or 2 children and no one hears a word from her (and you wonder why??)