Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Camilla: My Charles would never do that!
People UK ^ | Nov 9, 2003

Posted on 11/09/2003 4:16:32 PM PST by george wythe

Furious Royal mistress Camilla Parker Bowles last night slammed the "Charles-and-a-servant" scandal and insisted: "My prince would never do that."

Fighting back tears of rage, she dismissed the sleazy gossip as a "pack of vicious, evil lies" and added: "He would never stoop so low.

"Charles is a man of utter integrity and honesty. I trust him implicitly."

Camilla bitterly blamed Princess Diana's supporters for dragging up the claims made by a discredited former servant.

She told one confidante: "It's all so cruel and unfair. I know Charles better than anyone and there is not one iota of truth in this. How could there be?"

But stunned Camilla knows the public love royal gossip and fears people will think: "There's no smoke without fire."

The revelations broke while the 54-year-old prince was thousands of miles away on an official trip to India and the Gulf.And loyal Camilla, who has been phoning him several times a day, admitted he now sounds "miserable and adrift".

She revealed: "Charles told me all about this nonsense long, long ago. I dismissed it as the bitter ramblings of a disturbed alcoholic.

"But now it has come back to haunt us and his reputation is going to be dragged through the mire."

Camilla backed Charles's private secretary Sir Michael Peat for going on TV to denounce the prince's involvement in the "compromising" incident allegedly witnessed by former valet George Smith.

One of her friends told The People: "She thinks they couldn't just sit back and let the rumours build around the globe like a raging inferno. She knows the incident never happened.

"William and Harry know their father could never have done what is claimed. They say it is all complete fantasy.

"It is even more galling because Diana was behind the tape that started all this.

"When she recorded George Smith's claims, she knew she had a little bit of dynamite and could set it off in her husband's face whenever she needed too.

"Camilla realises Diana's most devoted supporters would love her to have the last laugh from beyond the grave. It's like a curse on her and Charles - andd she is horrified to think the public might actually believe these lies."

Charles himself gave permission for Sir Michael to make his official denial statement. He confided to courtiers at Clarence House that he felt "stuck between the devil and the deep blue sea".

And he told them: "I have nothing to fear about the rumour apart from the rumour itself."

One source said: "He thought it was pointless to pursue the tactic of burying your head in the sand in the hope it would go away.

"He felt going on the offensive was the only thing that could minimise the damage to his reputation.

"For all that has been claimed, Charles is still very keen to be King one day. A rumour like this could have completely destroyed his chances and he was not going to let that happen."

Senior royal staff at Clarence House agree that it is the biggest crisis the prince has had to face since Diana's death.

The British media has been banned by the High Court from disclosing details of the allegations.

Charles's ex-valet Michael Fawcett also originally gagged the Press from naming him.

But that injunction was lifted on Thursday after a newspaper said it had no intention of repeating claims about him.

Royal watchers and public relations advisers were split last night about whether the prince's tactic would be effective.

Royal author Ingrid Seward said: "It's quite unprecedented for his private secretary to come out and make a statement about something which we probably know about - but the great world at large don't really know what he's talking about.

"I don't think the allegation is something people would particularly want to hear."


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: princecharles
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 last
To: george wythe
Really don't have any one way or the other. I just don't believe Charles did this.

Is it wrong to have an opinion?
81 posted on 11/10/2003 11:02:18 AM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: bethelgrad
What's the point of the British monarchy these days? They have no power. What do they really do for England other than provide fodder for the SUN and People mag? I mean really, what is there purpose? Just possession of titles, crowns, and money?

'Cuz tourists are money.

82 posted on 11/10/2003 11:05:23 AM PST by dfwgator (All I want for Christmas is for Ron Zook to stay as head coach (at least till next year))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: freekitty
Really don't have any one way or the other. I just don't believe Charles did this.

What is "this"? The sex with servants or the coverup of palace rapes?

Is it wrong to have an opinion?

No.

83 posted on 11/10/2003 11:06:18 AM PST by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!
Even Ross Perot says, "Damn that Charles has got some big ass ears."
84 posted on 11/10/2003 11:07:03 AM PST by dfwgator (All I want for Christmas is for Ron Zook to stay as head coach (at least till next year))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: george wythe
Furious Royal mistress Camilla Parker Bowles last night slammed the "Charles-and-a-servant" scandal and insisted: "My prince would never do that."

Lady, don't make me get Dr. Laura on your a$$

85 posted on 11/10/2003 11:07:32 AM PST by BSunday (I'm not the bad guy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

"It's this big... the lie about me"


86 posted on 11/10/2003 1:31:28 PM PST by george wythe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Polybius
an heir and a spare

The spare is not the son of Charles, and that factoid is what the British press should be exploring.

87 posted on 11/10/2003 2:06:13 PM PST by Jackie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-87 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson