Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: blam
The settlers in the first wave, who walked across the Bering Land Bridge 15,000 years ago, were the forebears of present-day inhabitants south of the U.S.-Canadian border. The ancestors of linguistically distinct peoples including the Inuit, Aleut, and Na-Dene speakers made the watery crossing from Asia about 5,000 years ago.
(The people are todays American Indian/Native Americans)

I assume that the parenthentical material was inserted yourself?

If so, you TOTALLY misunderstood the article and actually the parenthetical inserts are COMPETELY contradictory to the immediately preceeding text.

The Inuit and Aleut are Eskimos. Na-Dene peoples are a small portion of current American Indians (Navajos are the largest group, I believe.) The author is ACTUALLY saying MOST of the current American Indians, based on his study, came here 15,000 years ago and are more closely related to the Ainu, etc.

5 posted on 11/07/2003 4:44:16 PM PST by John H K
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: John H K
It is confusing. The Eskimos are clearly different physically and socially from the Athabascan. Did the Athabascan come over first-wave or second-wave?
10 posted on 11/07/2003 4:56:03 PM PST by RightWhale (Close your tag lines)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: John H K
"I assume that the parenthentical material was inserted yourself?"

Yes.

The article is a little consfusing and I admit I have a pre-disposition to read it the way I've described it...based on loads of other articles I've read.

"The ancestors of linguistically distinct peoples including the Inuit, Aleut, and Na-Dene speakers made the watery crossing from Asia about 5,000 years ago."

Doesn't this statement confirm my 'reading' of the article? If I'm wrong...I'll be the first to admit it. I don't presently think I'm wrong.

12 posted on 11/07/2003 4:57:37 PM PST by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: John H K; blam
The Inuit and Aleut are Eskimos. Na-Dene peoples are a small portion of current American Indians (Navajos are the largest group, I believe.) The author is ACTUALLY saying MOST of the current American Indians, based on his study, came here 15,000 years ago and are more closely related to the Ainu, etc.

Seriously, folks, see the thesis of the late Joseph H. Greenberg's "Indo-European and its Closest Relatives," positing a Eurasiatic super-language family, encompassing Indo-European, Finno-Ugric (Uralic), Altaic (Turkic etc.), Nivkh (Gilyak), Chukchi-Koryak-Kamchadal, Japanese-Korean, and Eskimo-Aleut. The Amerind languages (first wave of migrants as opposed to second) are in turn the languages most closely related to the languages of this "Eurasiatic superfamily," according to Greenberg.

18 posted on 11/07/2003 5:18:35 PM PST by Map Kernow ("First...take a deep breath....then start yelling!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson