Iran-EU trade increases significantly in 2003
Friday, November 07, 2003
IranMania News
IRANMANIA - According to Iran's State News Agency (IRNA), trade between the European Union and Iran increased significantly in the first six month of 2003, with Iranian exports up by 28% and imports up by 17% compared with the same period last year.
Iranian exports to the EU grew to 3.3 billion Euros in the first half of this year, up from 2.6 billion Euros in the first six months of 2002.
EU exports to Iran also grew from 3.7 billion Euros 4.3 billion Euros over the same period. If the trend continues the value of this year’s trade is likely to exceed last year’s total of 13.6 billion Euros by at least 1.6 billion Euros to its highest ever level.
The increase in Iranian exports was dominated by the rise in EU oil imports. It continued to be led by Italy, Iran’s biggest European oil market, whose imports from Iran reached 935 million Euros, up 19 million Euros on the first half of 2002.
The significant increase in Iran's oil exports was to the Netherlands and Spain. A 162 million Euro increase to 488 million Euros in purchases by the Netherlands, home of the Rotterdam oil spot market. But there was an even bigger increase of 188 million Euros to 479 million Euros in exports to Spain.
The continuing growth in EU exports was led by Iran’s three largest suppliers, Germany, Italy and France, whose sales together totaled nearly 3 billion Euros.
Figures from Eurostat show that while Spain consolidated itself as Iran’s fourth biggest trading partner, Sweden may replace it in the future, as it doubled its exports to Iran to 228 million Euros and increased its imports by over 160 percent to 387 million Euros.
http://www.iranmania.com/News/ArticleView/Default.asp?NewsCode=19453&NewsKind=Business%20%26%20EconomyWorse than North Korea?
Nov. 2, 2003
Jerusalem Post
Over the past decade, the North Korean "people's" regime of Kim Jong-Il has starved an estimated three million of its citizens. A roughly equal number work in slave labor camps that dwarf Auschwitz in size and nearly in cruelty.
The regime has developed nuclear weapons, in violation of several agreements, and intends to sell those weapons to the highest bidder. It has lobbed ballistic missiles over Japan. It threatens a war of annihilation against its southern neighbor. It supports itself by dealing drugs and counterfeit currency. But at least it's not as bad as Israel.
That, at any rate, is the conclusion of a just-released poll of Europeans from 15 EU member states sponsored by the European Commission. Asked to rank 15 countries on how they threaten "world peace," Europeans chose their top threats thus: Israel, Iran, North Korea, Afghanistan, Iraq, and the United States.
A full 59 percent of those polled in 15 European nations ranked Israel as the top threat. What is one to make of this?
The simplest explanation cannot be dismissed. As Minister-without-Portfolio Natan Sharansky, responsible for Diaspora affairs, responded, the fact that Europe regards Israel as more threatening than nations that support and finance terrorism is "proof that behind 'political' criticism of Israel stands nothing less than pure anti-Semitism."
It is fair for Sharansky to challenge the EU to work to halt the "demonization" of Israel "before Europe again deteriorates to the dark vestiges of its past." But the poll results do not just reveal hateful and intense anti-Israel sentiment – they are incoherent.
Among the six nations ranked as top threats are two veteran democracies besieged by terrorism, the US and Israel; two rogue dictatorships, Iran and North Korea; and two former terrorist states now beginning to taste freedom, Afghanistan and Iraq. It is as if the European mind worked like this: any country that is in the headlines related to the war against terrorism, whatever side it is on and regardless of whether it is free or oppressed, is a threat to world peace.
We know that Europeans tend to regard any discussion of good and evil, or democracy and dictatorship, as "cowboy talk" and terribly unsophisticated. But now we find the European opposition to such petty distinctions taken to an opposite extreme.
How sophisticated is it for Europeans to become the modern-day equivalent of the old non-aligned movement with respect to the greatest threat of the day, the threat from militant Islam and its embrace of terrorism?
Truly sophisticated Europeans would perhaps notice that continental nihilism is getting out of hand. During the Cold War, an equally irresponsible neutralism became fashionable in Europe between the US and the Soviet Union. But in reality, Europe remained part of NATO and the threat of being overrun by Soviet divisions was extremely remote.
Not so in the current conflict.
Militant Islam and its arsenal of terrorism will either be beaten, or it will engulf Europe as well. It does not take an enormous degree of sophistication to realize that, now that the United States and Israel have come under vicious attack, remaining neutral in the struggle will not save protect Europe over the long run.
This realization seems to have begun to sink in to the extent that even Europe is worried about Iran developing nuclear weapons. But this poll shows that whatever ability European governments have to distinguish between political fashion and reality may not extend to European publics.
The fact that so many Europeans feel that Israel and the United States are threats to world peace comparable to Iran and North Korea bespeaks a profound intellectual and ideological malaise.
Is Europe's fourth estate so confused that it would have answered the poll the same way?
In any case, European journalists should ask themselves, did we really intend to lump Israel, now suffering its fourth year of suicide bombings, along with Iran, a primary terrorism sponsor, and North Korea, a nuclear proliferator?
Ironically, the same poll found that 81 percent of Europeans thought that the EU should become more involved in Middle East peacemaking efforts.
Obviously, such polls confirm every Israeli instinct to keep Europeans as far away from any position of diplomatic influence as possible.
Memo to Europe: Demonizing a democracy under attack is no way to win friends and influence people.
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull&cid=1067749438239&p=1006953079865