Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: 4ConservativeJustices
I'm not opposed to the use of nukes - I'm opposed to attacking innocents. If the target is military and isolated nuke away. Otherwise, there are still conventional weapons that can be used.

That sounds like McGovern libspeak to me. Do you really believe thats how nuclear deterrence works, or that the theater nuclear weapons that Reagan was able to deploy in Europe were not targeted on major population centers?

822 posted on 11/24/2003 1:31:27 PM PST by mac_truck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 820 | View Replies ]


To: mac_truck
That sounds like McGovern libspeak to me.

In your 791 you wrote: "The total war tactics adopted by the North are (imo) akin to our use of atomic weapons on the Japanese. Would you suggest the US was not correct in delivering to its enemy such devastation as would require its immediate surrender?"

Your comment addressed the use of nuclear weapons on popultaion centers, to which I responded. Your admission was that ANY means are legitimate, which would include the targeting of your family by our enemies. I prefer to chose military targets, and save the lives of non-combatants.

824 posted on 11/24/2003 1:45:24 PM PST by 4CJ ('Scots vie 4 tavern juices' - anagram by paulklenk, 22 Nov 2003)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 822 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson