And you have failed to provide any evidence that Davis fought for one.
Care to try your case in front of a jury?
Sure. Would you?
I know you must be tired of trying to defend all the unconstitutional things Lincoln did, but if your only defense is to create a diversion by making unsupported accusations against Davis, then you must have a pretty weak case for defending Lincoln.
Are you trying to deflect attention from the unconstitutional and criminal actions of the Davis regime by bringing in Lincoln? Better try and support your claim that Davis supported the court, other than a single throw-away line in one of the last sentences of a speech.
Sure he has. It appears in a very prominent public address before Congress.
Already did, last April (non-seq loses again). And your claim about the Confederate judiciary not being formed (yet again).
You sound like a desperate lawyer trying to convince a jury when his case doesn't have a leg to stand on. You are the one making a claim for which you have no evidence.
Single-line throw-away is your characterization, not mine. Let's look at some singles lines.
"Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall!" This single line came in the middle of the speech, but what the heck.
"From Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic, an iron curtain has descended across the Continent." That's about 2/3rds the way down. That far enough for you?
"I believe that this nation should commit itself to achieving the goal, before this decade is out, of landing a man on the Moon and returning him safely to the Earth." That's about 3/4th the way down.
Single lines can be pretty effective. Those above were more moving and more effective than Davis' one-line call for the Confederate Congress to do its duty, but you can't dispute that Davis said it. Case closed unless you can find where Davis argued against forming the Supreme Court. Psst, the ball's in your court. Been in your court for a while.