Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lazamataz
You have a right to be safe on the streets. If I rob you, I have violated that right. You have a right to the legal protections granted in the Constitution, and if those are removed, your rights to them have been violated.

Laz, grow up and give the clintonisms. The truth of the matter is that Nixon was the only president to embarrass himself out of office, and while the technical process of impeachment under your legalistic definitions was applied to others, it didn't mean crap in the end.

Go ahead, tell that Nixon leaving office all depended on the meaning of the word is.

Laz, if walks like a duck, looks like a duck and acts like a duck, then it is a duck no matter how many times and way you define it to be porter house steak or whatever other childness nonsense you want to delude yourself with.

You are just hiding behind legalisms, and are behaving exactly as clinton did. Wake up and smell the coffee.
500 posted on 11/16/2003 8:44:07 AM PST by Held_to_Ransom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 496 | View Replies ]


To: Held_to_Ransom
Laz, grow up and give the clintonisms. You are just hiding behind legalisms, and are behaving exactly as clinton did. Wake up and smell the coffee.

Here's a cup of nice hot joe, mack -- because I am ADHERING to the definition of the word "impeach". If anything, it is you who is behaving Clinton-ly, since it is you who wants to ignore the real meaning of a word and redefine it on-the-fly.

The truth of the matter is that Nixon was the only president to embarrass himself out of office

Only because Clinton is -- being as he is shameless -- impossible to embarrass into any act of decency, ever.

Let us be very clear about this: Richard Nixon resigned, and Bill Clinton was impeached.

501 posted on 11/16/2003 8:53:34 AM PST by Lazamataz (PROUDLY SCARING FELLOW FREEPERS SINCE 1999 !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies ]

To: Held_to_Ransom
Besides, you posted this to the wrong thread.

I can tell you are not a member of the scientific trades, nor are you formally educated in science and/or logic. Your imprecision and lack-of-coherence demonstrates that.

502 posted on 11/16/2003 9:03:49 AM PST by Lazamataz (PROUDLY SCARING FELLOW FREEPERS SINCE 1999 !!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 500 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson