Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
They could have been.... But wasn't. Ships were not stopped, the city wasn't fired on, not a single hostile act was taken towards the people of Charleston or the Davis regime from the moment the rebellion began until the minute that the confederate army began the bombardment of Sumter.

Yeah. And Saddam Hussein could have dumped anthrax in our cities but didn't. Nevermind that he had used the stuff elsewhere before and nevermind that in all likelihood he was plotting to use it against us if he ever got the chance. I guess the fact that he never did means we had no basis to remove him from power, and I guess that it is only legitimate to remove a threat to you AFTER it has pulverized a couple of your cities and waged terroristic warfare on your people.

The fact is that the Fort Sumter garrison was a hostile army exercising hostile and threatening intent against the city of Charleston. Under the doctrine of preemptive war the people of Charleston had every right in the world to remove that threat.

314 posted on 11/10/2003 7:36:52 PM PST by GOPcapitalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 284 | View Replies ]


To: GOPcapitalist
The fact is that the Fort Sumter garrison was a hostile army exercising hostile and threatening intent against the city of Charleston.

What hostile and threatening gestures did the Fort Sumter garrison make?

332 posted on 11/11/2003 3:54:20 AM PST by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 314 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson