[cyn]

exactly! and why it was forbidden to shoot video and and take pictures, and Terri's parents were barred from seeing Terri without Michaels rep after they made them public! Those pictures are powerful.

He doesn't like it infringes on her "right to privacy. " . . .or is it her right to life?

[msmagoo]

exactly! and why it was forbidden to shoot video and and take pictures, and Terri's parents were barred from seeing Terri without Michaels rep after they made them public! Those pictures are powerful. He doesn't like it infringes on her "right to privacy. " . . .or is it her right to life?

He's a control freak who delights in tormenting his victims, methinks.

[Graymatter]

"Right to privacy."

I just don't get it. If she's dead enough to starve, she's too dead to have privacy.
Schiavo and Felos keep talking about the Terri-that-was-and-is-no-more. They have the exclusive power to divine this Terri's wishes and intentions (sort of like a fictional character, isn't it? They ought to copyright her.)
Problem is, if this Terri died 13 years ago, in Michael's arms as he says, and she has no right to live, because she just doesn't, how does she come by a right to privacy? And a right that they may dispose, at that?
No right to live, no right to eat or drink, but to an abstraction like privacy, their Terri has a right?
No, I just don't get it.