Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Krodg
If their initial argument wasn't framed in a way that would make the law applicable, then I can see this instance.

Otherwise, weren't they arguing apples and oranges?
237 posted on 11/05/2003 5:12:54 PM PST by Pan_Yans Wife (You may forget the one with whom you have laughed, but never the one with whom you have wept.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]


To: Pan_Yans Wife
If their initial argument wasn't framed in a way that would make the law applicable, then I can see this instance.

FWIU, the last hearing for Terri's guardianship was a long time ago, before Michael and Jodi moved in together. As such, it could not have been brought up as a subject then. However, there was something decidedly improper about Judge Greer firing a guardian ad litem who sought to point out that impropriety.

My personal thinking is that Greer realizes that he has to tread very carefully or risk impeachment; the timing of the motion to remove Michael as guardian could turn out to be good, if Greer doesn't allow endless continuances.

241 posted on 11/05/2003 5:21:35 PM PST by supercat (Why is it that the more "gun safety" laws are passed, the less safe my guns seem?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson