To: MEGoody
If you say "No, I don't mean there aren't things that should be prohibited," then you must provide a convincing argument why changing the current drug laws would be a good thing.If you say "Yes, nothing should be prohibited," then please give me your address. I need some things, and I thought I could save some money by simply taking them from your home.
False dichotomy. Nothing that violates nobody's rights should be prohibited.
32 posted on
11/04/2003 10:36:37 AM PST by
MrLeRoy
(The legitimate powers of government extend to such acts only as are injurious to others. - Jefferson)
To: MrLeRoy
"Nothing that violates nobody's rights should be prohibited."
Ah, I see. So even things under the influence of which people often do things that deprive people of their rights are okay by you. I get it.
44 posted on
11/04/2003 11:01:22 AM PST by
MEGoody
To: MrLeRoy
"Nothing that violates nobody's rights should be prohibited."
Ah, I see. So even things under the influence of which people often do things that deprive people of their rights are okay by you. I get it.
45 posted on
11/04/2003 11:01:52 AM PST by
MEGoody
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson