In other words, you want evidence that you can't have - "observing" such a thing in nature would take millions of years of watching, and neither of us is going to be around that long. And if I sling together enough mutations to do the same thing in a timely fashion in the lab, you'll simply say that this is no evidence of "natural processes" when a person does it, right?
The discovery of an animal (A) that can fertilize the seed of animals (B) and (C) while animal B cannot fertilize the seed of C.
Pick any three animals of the same species you like, and that condition is satisfied. I'll let you think about that one for a moment, and if you still don't understand, I'll explain why that condition is almost always true ;)
LOL, but that's not what I meant.:-)
But it shouldn't take a million years. it should take a nano-second. Here you have this single-celled creature, now it's a multi-celled one.
And if I sling together enough mutations to do the same thing in a timely fashion in the lab, you'll simply say that this is no evidence of "natural processes" when a person does it, right?
Actually, no. Has this been done?